(PC) Steele v. Shasta County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DERRICK SKYLER STEELE, No. 2:21-cv-0062 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SHASTA COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 6, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint, and he was given thirty days to do so. ECF No. 7. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a District Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local…