Cox
(PC) Bailey v. Cox
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TIMOTHY BAILEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
RESPONSE TO COURT’S FEBRUARY 9,
v. 2023, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
T. COX, et al., (ECF No. 21) Defendants.
15 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This action proceeds on Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Defendants Zaragoza, Cox, Runmos, Jr., Gunn, Hernedez, and Mejia, and sexual assault claim against Defendant Mejia. On October 28, 2022, the Court forwarded Plaintiff the necessary service of process forms for completion and return within thirty days. (ECF No. 12.) On December 14, 2022, after Plaintiff returned the completed service of process forms, the Court issued an order directing service on Defendants Zaragoza, Cox, Runmos, Jr., Gunn, Hernedez, and…