Phull

Gilbert v. Phull

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20231:22-cv-00167California964 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00167-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE1 v. 14 DAY DEADLINE

SUKHBIR SINGH PHULL, dba Shop N Save Market; JAGJEET SINGH, dba Shop N Save Market; JOSEPH SANDOVAL, Trustee of the SANDOVAL FAMILY TRUST, under instrument dated January 16, 2018; SALLY SANDOVAL, Trustee of the SANDOVAL FAMILY TRUST, under instrument dated January 16, 2018, 18 Defendants. 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment filed October 12, 2022 (Doc. No. 13). Plaintiff Darren Gilbert commenced this action by filing a complaint against Defendants Sukhbir Singh Phull and Jagjett Singh, doing business as Shop N Save Market; and Joseph Sandoval and Sally Sandoval as Trustees of the Sandoval Family Trust (collectively “Defendants”) alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq (Count I); the California Unruh Act, California Civil Code § 51…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.