(PC) Thorn v. Sac Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20232:23-cv-00069California310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAYSON THORN, No. 2:23-cv-0069-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND SAC JAIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 By an order filed January 18, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 17 pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 18 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this 21 matter to a district court judge. 22 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.