(PC) Harris v. Solano County Sheriffs Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20232:21-cv-00688California310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE HARRIS, No. 2:21-cv-0688 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On January 23, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a first amended complaint and to do so within thirty days. ECF No. 13. This was the second time that the court had ordered plaintiff to do so. See ECF No. 9 at 2 (order issued 11/4/22). More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, nor has he responded to the court’s order in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a District Judge to this matter. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.