Doe

Doe v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20231:22-cv-01569California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01569-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE THE STATE OF

v. CALIFORNIA AND CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND

GREG RODRIGUEZ, et al., REHABILITATION AS DEFENDANTS IN

THIS ACTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 27) 16 Plaintiff initiated this action on December 5, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) On March 7, 2023, the parties filed a stipulated notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) of Defendants State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (ECF No. 27.) The dismissal of these Defendants is without prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (Id.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. (Id.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.