Doe
Doe v. Rodriguez
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20231:22-cv-01569California378 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JANE DOE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01569-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE THE STATE OF
v. CALIFORNIA AND CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
GREG RODRIGUEZ, et al., REHABILITATION AS DEFENDANTS IN
THIS ACTION
Defendants. (ECF No. 27) 16 Plaintiff initiated this action on December 5, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) On March 7, 2023, the parties filed a stipulated notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) of Defendants State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (ECF No. 27.) The dismissal of these Defendants is without prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and fees. (Id.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. (Id.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. …