(PC) Edwards v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20232:22-cv-01854California2,333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. EDWARDS, No. 2:22-cv-1854 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he was denied adequate medical care. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 6) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 6.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.