Son

(PC) Casity v. Son

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20232:22-cv-01983California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD D. CASITY, No. 2:22-cv-1983 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MONIVIRIN SON, et al., Defendants. 16 On January 24, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit, and he was given thirty days to do so. ECF No. 11. This was the third time plaintiff had been ordered to file a properly completed in forma pauperis application. See ECF Nos. 4, 8, 11. With each order, he was sent a new in forma pauperis application. See id. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff still has not filed a properly completed in forma pauperis application, nor, in the alternative, has he paid the filing fee. Given the number of opportunities plaintiff has been given to file a proper in forma pauperis application, it appears that he is unable or unwilling to do so. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. These…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.