Chandra

(PC) Garcia v. Chandra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20232:22-cv-01221California365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN DARIO GARCIA, JR., No. 2:22-cv-1221 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. CHANDRA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff elected to amend his complaint in response to the February 2, 2023 screening order, and filed a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 11) is granted; and

In addition to complying with the provisions of the February 2, 2023 order, plaintiff is cautioned that claims raised in an amended complaint must be properly joined. A plaintiff may 22 properly assert multiple claims against a single defendant. Fed. Rule Civ. P. 18. In addition, a plaintiff may join multiple defendants in one action where “any right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions and occurrences”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.