Castro

(PC) Williams v. Castro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20231:20-cv-01617California3,929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III Case No. 1:20-cv-01617-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS IN LIMINE

CASTRO, et al., (ECF Nos. 60, 86)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Castro-Mendoza and Reguero for death threats, failure to protect, and equal protection violations. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motions in limine, filed December 12, 2022, and supplemental motions in limine, filed February 21, 2023. Plaintiff did not file an opposition and the time to do so has passed. (ECF No. 77.) I. LEGAL STANDARD “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance testimony or evidence in a particular area.” United States v. Heller, 551 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2009). A party may use a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.