Castro
(PC) Williams v. Castro
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III Case No. 1:20-cv-01617-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTIONS IN LIMINE
CASTRO, et al., (ECF Nos. 60, 86)
Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Castro-Mendoza and Reguero for death threats, failure to protect, and equal protection violations. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motions in limine, filed December 12, 2022, and supplemental motions in limine, filed February 21, 2023. Plaintiff did not file an opposition and the time to do so has passed. (ECF No. 77.) I. LEGAL STANDARD “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance testimony or evidence in a particular area.” United States v. Heller, 551 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2009). A party may use a…