(PC) Carroll v. Vallejo Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20231:23-cv-00004California675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREMAINE DEON CARROLL, 1:23-cv-00004-JLT-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

VALLEJO POLICE EXTENSION OF TIME TO PAY FILING DEPARTMENT, et al., FEE AS MOOT 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 8.)

17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND Tremaine Deon Carroll (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 21 rights case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on January 3, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On January 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 5.) On February 10, 2023, the Court screened the 24 First Amended Complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend within thirty days. (ECF No. 7.) On February 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel and motion for 27 a 60-day extension of time to pay the filing fee for this case. (ECF No. 8.) II. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.