(PC) Fuentes v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20232:23-cv-00386California2,704 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID FUENTES, SR., No. 2:23-cv-0386 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and paid the court’s filing fee in full. Plaintiff also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Screening Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally “frivolous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.