Romero

(PC) Williams v. Romero

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20232:17-cv-01884California3,285 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, No. 2:17-cv-1884 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROMERO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff claims defendants Romero and Zuniga violated his Eighth Amendment rights when they closed a mechanical door on him and refused to release him. Plaintiff further claims all defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights when they denied him medical care. Below, this court addresses the status of this case based on recent filings, denies plaintiff’s motion to compel defendants’ to respond to discovery, and sets a schedule going forward. STATUS OF THIS CASE Until just recently, plaintiff’s last filing in this court was his September 9, 2022 request for an extension of time to file a reply to defendants’ opposition to his motion to compel. (ECF No. 178.) He has not filed an opposition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.