CDCR

(PC) Gallegos v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20232:22-cv-01790California1,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN ROBERT GALLEGOS, No. 2:22-cv-01790-DAD-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After dismissal of the original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, which the court must screen.1 Screening Order Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges that he has been denied the right to marry for no legitimate reason. ECF No. 14 at 3. While most of the allegations are too vague and conclusory to establish a violation of this right, the complaint does set forth sufficient detail to state a

1 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 26 § 1915A(a). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.