Farhat

(PC) Hearne v. Farhat

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20232:20-cv-00557California635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN ANDREW HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-00557-DAD-DB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

FARHAT, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 80, 100) 16 Plaintiff John Andrew Hearne is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 23, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 80) be granted due to plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit as is required. (Doc. No. 100.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty (20) days after service. (Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.