Mayfield

(PC) Ramos v. Mayfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20231:21-cv-01036California910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 LEOBARDO ERIC RAMOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01036-ADA-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 MAYFIELD, et al., (ECF No. 91) 13 Defendants.

15 16 Leobardo Ramos (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is currently proceeding on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Mayfield and defendant Doe. (ECF No. 21). All other claims were dismissed. (Id.). On February 27, 2023, Plaintiff lodged an amended complaint. (ECF No. 89). The Court informed Plaintiff that if he wanted to amend his complaint, he needed to file a motion for leave to amend. (ECF No. 90). The Court also noted that, “[a]s there [was] no motion for leave to amend, there [was] no explanation as to what changes Plaintiff is attempting to make or why he should be allowed to make those changes at this time.” (Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.