Toste

Courthouse News Service v. Toste

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20231:21-cv-01790California373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01790-ADA-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE STEPHANIE

v. HANSEL AND NOCONA SOBOLESKI AS

DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION

AMANDA TOSTE, et al., (ECF Nos. 37, 38) Defendants.

16 On March 13, 2023, the parties filed stipulated dismissals pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) as to the dismissal of Defendants Stephanie Hansel and Nocona Soboleski, in their official capacities as court executive officer/clerk of the Sutter County Superior Court and court executive officer/clerk of the Kings County Superior Court, respectively. (ECF Nos. 37, 38.) The dismissal of these Defendants is with prejudice. (ECF No. 37 at 2; ECF No. 38 at 2.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.