Meraz-Valencia
Meraz-Valencia v. Westlake Royal Roofing, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO MERAZ-VALENCIA, on behalf No. 2:22-cv-00491-DAD-AC of himself and the putative Class Members, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING, LLC;
and DOES 1–100, inclusive, (Doc. No. 46) Defendants. 17 The matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss filed by defendant Westlake Royal Roofing, LLC (“Westlake”) on February 2, 2023 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 46.) On March 14, 2023, defendant’s motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 49.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant in part and deny in part defendant’s motion. ///// /////
Although defendant styles the pending motion as one to dismiss “and/or” strike, it does not appear that defendant seeks to “strike from a pleading . . . any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, 26 or scandalous…