Acevedo
Acevedo v. Russell Cellular, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20231:20-cv-01440California1,602 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARCO ACEVEDO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01440-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING MICHAEL FREIMAN
TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FURTHER
v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED,
WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN
RUSSELL CELLULAR, INC., CONTEMPT, AND WHY HE SHOULD
NOT BE DISBARRED FROM THE
Defendant. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(ECF Nos. 50, 55)
SEVEN DAY DEADLINE
17 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Marco Acevedo initiated this action in state court on September 8, 2020. (ECF No. 1-3.) On October 8, 2020, Defendant Russell Cellular, Inc. removed the action to this Court. (ECF No. 1.) On May 19, 2021, the Court stayed this matter to allow the parties to participate in arbitration. (ECF No. 15.) Since then, the parties, though primarily Plaintiff through counsel Michael Freiman (“Counsel” or “Mr. Freiman”), failed to demonstrate diligence in…