Acevedo

Acevedo v. Russell Cellular, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20231:20-cv-01440California1,602 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCO ACEVEDO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01440-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING MICHAEL FREIMAN

TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FURTHER

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED,

WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN

RUSSELL CELLULAR, INC., CONTEMPT, AND WHY HE SHOULD

NOT BE DISBARRED FROM THE

Defendant. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

(ECF Nos. 50, 55)

SEVEN DAY DEADLINE

17 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Marco Acevedo initiated this action in state court on September 8, 2020. (ECF No. 1-3.) On October 8, 2020, Defendant Russell Cellular, Inc. removed the action to this Court. (ECF No. 1.) On May 19, 2021, the Court stayed this matter to allow the parties to participate in arbitration. (ECF No. 15.) Since then, the parties, though primarily Plaintiff through counsel Michael Freiman (“Counsel” or “Mr. Freiman”), failed to demonstrate diligence in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.