Palomares
Palomares v. City of Arvin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL PALOMARES, Case No. 1:21-cv-01745-JLT-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION DENYING v. SECOND AMENDMENT TO
SCHEDULING ORDER
CITY OF ARVIN, et al., (Doc. 30) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated request for a four-month extension in all discovery, pretrial motion and trial dates. (Doc. 30). The Court previously granted a two-month extension of all case management dates following the parties’ earlier request for a six-month extension. (Doc. 26). Thus, the parties’ pending stipulation for order represents a second request for the same four-month period the Court previously declined to grant due to the parties’ failure to demonstrate good cause. The bases advanced in support of the request for extension are that the parties began but have been unable to complete for various reasons depositions of Plaintiff and three non-party witnesses (Jose Negrete, Phillip Munoz and…