Miranda

Miranda v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20231:21-cv-01763California1,632 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND MIRANDA, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1763 JLT HBK ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO v. ) PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY ) WITH THE COURT’S ORDER DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY INTERNAL )

REVENUE SERVICE, )

) Defendant. ) ) )

Raymond Miranda asserts that he did not receive economic impact payments to which he was entitled under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act; the Consolidated Appropriations Act; and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. (See Doc. 1 at 3-4.) Because Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply with the Court’s order, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. I. Relevant Background On December 31, 2021, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint in which he asserted the defendants did not issue his economic impact payments (“EIPs”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.