Borges

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT COFFMAN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00012-CDB

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v.

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO

BORGES, ET AL,

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS;

ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY

Defendants.

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff filed a complaint on January 3, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) That same day, the Clerk of Court issued summonses and the Court entered an Order setting a mandatory scheduling conference. (ECF Nos. 2, 3.) The Order directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” The Order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this action “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants.” To date, Plaintiff has not filed proofs of service, and the defendants have not appeared in the action. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a…