Do
(PC) Brown v. Do
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LACRISHA MARTIN, also known as No. 2:22-CV-1781-TLN-DMC-P
TSHAUNA BROWN,
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. 14 KIM DO, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2023, the Court determined that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was appropriate for service and directed Plaintiff to submit documents for service by the United States Marshal within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to submit the required documents may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the…