Block

Block v. Alzamzami

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20231:23-cv-00061California933 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENDRIK BLOCK,

9 Case No. 1:23-cv-00061-SKO Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

ESKANDAR T. ALZAMZAMI dba Fatboy Market, et al., 14 DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

14 On January 12, 2023, Plaintiff Hendrik Block (“Plaintiff”) filed his Complaint against Defendants Eskandar T. Alzamzami dba Fatboy Market and Nahla Mohammed Muharram (“Defendants”). (Doc. 1.) The Complaint asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act and a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Act. (Id.) No defendant has appeared in this action, and default has been entered. (Doc. 7.) Based upon the recent Ninth Circuit opinion in Vo v. Choi, the Court will order Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th 1167 (9th Cir. 2022)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.