Pfeiffer

I. BACKGROUND

24 The assigned magistrate judge initially screened Plaintiff’s complaint on November 21, 25 2019. (ECF No. 18). At that time, Plaintiff was given an opportunity to amend his complaint. (Id.) 26 On February 10, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending 27 that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed. (ECF No. 25). Specifically, the magistrate judge recommended 28 that Plaintiff’s federal claims related to the May 16, 2019, incident at issue in Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice and that Plaintiff’s other federal and state law claims be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 2, 19). The assigned district judge adopted the findings and recommendation in full on April 14, 2020. (ECF No. 27). At that time, the assigned district judge also addressed various motions filed by Plaintiff: 5 Finally, the court briefly addresses the various other motions plaintiff has filed. 6 These include: (1) a motion to reconsider the undersigned September 18, 2019 order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”); (2) a motion to “log” medical records in support of that TRO; (3) an amended motion to “log” …