Burnes

(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20231:22-cv-00233California839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDIE ANTHONY JARAMILLO, Case No. 1:22-cv-00233-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

v. (ECF No. 15)

BURNES, et al., ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

Defendants. FEE AND FAILURE TO OBEY COURT

ORDER

(ECF No. 14) 17 Plaintiff Rudie Anthony Jaramillo (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 24, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because he can afford the costs of this action. (ECF No. 8.) The Magistrate Judge also recommended that Plaintiff be ordered to pay the required $402.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff filed objections on March 10, 2022, arguing that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.