Gastelum

Gastelum v. Best Buy, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20231:23-cv-00244California5,731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:23-cv-00244-ADA-BAM Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING

BEST BUY, INC., STATE LAW CLAIMS WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

15 Defendant.

17 On February 17, 2023, Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum, proceeding pro se, initiated this action against Defendant Best Buy, Inc. (Doc. 1.) The Complaint asserts claims for injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), a claim for statutory damages under California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), and a claim for damages under California Disabled Persons Act pursuant to California Civil Code §§ 54-54.3. (Id.) Defendant has not yet appeared in this action, and it appears that Plaintiff served Defendant’s agent. (Doc. 7.) On February 24, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.