Hodan

(PC) Hill v. Hodan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20231:21-cv-01311California1,576 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN TRACEY HILL, Case No.: 1:21-cv-01311-ADA-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY

E. HODAN, et al., COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 Plaintiff Brian Tracey Hill is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a complaint on August 30, 2021. (Doc. 1.) On January 25, 2023, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 15.) The Court found Plaintiff’s complaint states cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against named Defendants Hodan, Sizemore, Cruz and Fezeu, but failed to state any other cognizable claim against any named Defendant. (Id. at 11.) Plaintiff was directed to select one of the following options: (1) file a notice with the Court indicating his election to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.