Limon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENDA A. LIMON, Case No. 1:22-cv-01573-ADA-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT v. BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

THREE-DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 15 A scheduling conference in this action was held on March 21, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. (ECF No. 7.) No counsel for Plaintiff appeared at the scheduling conference. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000). …