Venmo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DERRICK JEROME LEWIS, No. 2:22-cv-00856 KJM CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER VENMO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c). On July 6, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff was re-served with the findings and recommendations at his new address on January 25, 2023. Plaintiff has not filed objections. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district…