Jurgens

Jurgens v. Velocity Investments, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20231:22-cv-00223California257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 AMANDA JURGENS, No. 1:22-cv-00223-ADA-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al, (Doc. 31) Defendants. 13 14 On March 20, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice.1 (Doc. 31.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 21, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23 24 25 1 The parties’ stipulation also provided that the Court “retain ancillary jurisdiction for enforcement of the Settlement 26 Agreement between the Parties in its Order.” (See Doc. 31 at 2.) The Court in its discretion declines to adopt this portion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.