Nevis

Nevis v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20232:17-cv-02295California2,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS, No. 2:17-cv-02295-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

AMTRAK’S MOTION TO COMPEL

RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SATISFACTION al., OF THE JUDGMENT 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 368)

17 The matter is before the court on the motion to compel plaintiff’s acknowledgment of satisfaction of the judgment pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 724.050 filed by defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”). (Doc. No. 368.) On March 15, 2023, defendant Amtrak’s motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 385.) For the reasons explained below, the court will deny the motion. BACKGROUND On October 28, 2022, a jury verdict was rendered in this case in favor of plaintiff. (Doc. No. 331.) On December 22, 2022, the court entered judgment. (Doc. Nos. 354, 355.) On February 3, 2023, defendant Amtrak…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.