Anastassiou

(PC) Morales v. Anastassiou

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20232:20-cv-00704California2,299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH MORALES, No. 2:20-cv-00704-DAD-KJN (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

PETER ANASTASSIOU, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendant. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION (Doc. Nos. 48, 64, 68)

17 Plaintiff Ralph Morales is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 29, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s request for judicial notice (Doc. No. 64) and findings and recommendations recommending that: (1) defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 48) be granted because there is no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether defendant acted with deliberate indifference…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.