Rodriguez

(PC) Crane v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20232:15-cv-00208California1,126 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD J. CRANE, No. 2: 15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions for clarification and for extension of time to file a reply to defendants’ opposition to plaintiff’s motion for clarification. (ECF No. 325, 329.) Also pending is the request for sanctions filed by defendants Barton, etc. (ECF Nos. 327.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motions for clarification and for extension of time are denied, and the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion for sanctions be denied. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 329) In the opposition to plaintiff’s motion for clarification, defendants request that plaintiff be sanctioned. (ECF No. 327.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.