Olfati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PARVIN OLFATI, 2:21-cv-00606-DAD-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

18 The court granted in full plaintiff’s January 18, 2023 motion to compel (ECF Nos. 130, 142.) Plaintiff’s supplemental fee application is before the court. (ECF No. 145.) Pertinent to the motion to compel at issue, defendants, the City of Sacramento and individual City of Sacramento defendants (“City defendants”) objected to producing prior police reports involving plaintiff in response to multiple requests for production of documents under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In briefing before the court, the City defendants failed to cite any federal statutory, constitutional, or case law authority to support their position that “privacy of the victim and/or third parties” prevented discovery. (See ECF No. 131 at 10, 21.) Defendants also unsuccessfully argued that the reports were irrelevant and not within…