Reade

Reade v. New York Times Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20232:22-cv-00543California1,331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 TARA READE, No. 2:22−cv−00543 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Defendant. 17 ----oo0oo---- The court previously granted defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, Cal. Code Civ. P. § 425.16. (Docket No. 21.) Judgment pursuant to that order was entered on October 14, 2022. (Docket No. 30.) Defendant filed a motion for attorneys’ fees on December 13, 2022. (“Mot.” (Docket No. 33).) Notwithstanding the passage of more than three months since the motion for attorneys’ fees was filed, plaintiff has not filed an opposition. When contacted by the court, plaintiff’s counsel of record stated that he would not be filing an opposition or any other pleadings in response to this motion. Accordingly, the court will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.