Longoria

(PC) Paul E. Duran v. Longoria

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20231:20-cv-00289California322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL EDWARD DURAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-0289-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

OF ADDENDUM

v. (Doc. No. 26) LONGORIA, CASE, E. PARKS, M.

GAMBOA, W. SINKOVICH,

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Paul Duran, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to file an addendum to his third amended complaint. (Doc. No. 26). After a plaintiff files a complaint he may not later “add facts, arguments, or evidence to his complaint[.]” Thomas v. Green, 2012 WL 4672366, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2012) (citing L.R. 220). The “complaint must be complete within itself.” Id. (citing L.R. 220). Plaintiff filed his third amended complaint on March 6, 2023, and afterwards, on March 17, 2023, he filed the instant motion. (Doc. Nos. 25, 26). Plaintiff cannot add facts, arguments, or evidence to his third amended complaint after it has been filed. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.