Gill

(PC) Stobbe v. Gill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20231:20-cv-00656California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST STOBBE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00656-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. TEN-DAY DEADLINE GILL et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Forrest Stobbe, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff concurrently paid the filing fee. (Receipt #CAE100045610). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state a claim. (Doc. No. 4 at 1). Plaintiff timely filed a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 5). On February 3, 2023, the Court screened the FAC and found that it stated cognizable Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Rehabilitation Act (“RA”) claims against one Defendant, but no others. (Doc. 9 at 1-2). Plaintiff was ordered to respond within 21 days to advise the Court whether he would (1) stand on his FAC as screened and proceed only on his ADA and RA claims against Defendant Gill in her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.