(PC)Ballesteros

(PC)Ballesteros v. Garza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20231:22-cv-00997California2,522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 BENJAMIN I. BALLESTEROS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00997-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

GARZA, FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

14 Defendant. (ECF No. 11)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Benjamin Ballesteros (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on August 10, 2022. (ECF No. 1). On December 8, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 8). The Court found that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims, and gave Plaintiff thirty days to either: “a. File a First Amended Complaint; or b. Notify the Court in writing that he wants to stand on his complaint.” (Id. at 6-7). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.