Norton

Norton v. Mandarich Law Group, LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20231:22-cv-00327California4,689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GAYLE NORTON, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-0327 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION ) TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND v. ) ) (Doc. 17) MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) )

Gayle Norton asserts Mandarich Law Group acted unlawfully in attempting to collect a debt, violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. (Doc. 15.) Mandarich Law Group seeks dismissal of the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 17.) Norton opposes the motion, arguing the allegations are sufficient to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 20.) The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral arguments, and the matter remains under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the First Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.