Saeturn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID MacLEOD, No. 2:21-CV-2230-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M. SAETURN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions, ECF Nos. 1 and 2, for injunctive relief. The legal principles applicable to requests for injunctive relief, such as a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are well established. To prevail, the moving party must show that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction. See Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 586 F.3d 1109, 1127 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 365 (2008)). To the extent prior Ninth Circuit cases suggest a lesser standard by focusing solely on the possibility of irreparable harm, such cases are “no longer controlling, or even viable.” Am. Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles,…