Thompson

(HC) Muniz v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20232:21-cv-01820California4,630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE LUIS MUNIZ, No. 2:21-cv-1820 TLN AC P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 8. Prior to respondent moving to dismiss the petition, petition filed his opposition. ECF No. 7. After respondent’s motion was filed, petitioner was given an opportunity to supplement his opposition (ECF No. 9), but he did not submit any further response. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that respondent’s motion be granted. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Petitioner is an inmate who is currently housed at the Federal Correctional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.