(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20232:22-cv-01205California293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:22-cv-01205 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed January 18, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was found not to state a cognizable claim and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. More than thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.