Rallos

(PC) Hash v. Rallos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20232:20-cv-01272California544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, No. 2:20-cv-1272 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. RALLOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion for a thirty-day extension of time to serve written discovery requests. ECF No. 70. The time for serving written discovery requests closed on October 3, 2022. ECF No. 50 at 5. Plaintiff now seeks to re-open this deadline on the ground that he recently learned defendants were untruthful in responding to discovery requests related to prior lawsuits and inmate appeals. ECF No. 70 at 1-2. In considering whether to grant a motion to amend the scheduling order and re-open discovery, the court is to consider: “1) whether trial is imminent, 2) whether the request is opposed, 3) whether the non-moving party would be prejudiced, 4) whether the moving party was diligent in obtaining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.