Munoz
(PC) Harris v. Munoz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE BERNARD HARRIS Case No. 1:21-cv-01372-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ONLY
v. ON COGNIZABLE FIRST AMENDMENT
CLAIMS1
E. MUNOZ, J. CERDA, E. SILVA, A. PEDERSON, K. MATTA, and M. (Doc. No. 14) MEDINA,
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
Defendants.
18 Plaintiff Devonte Bernard Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding on his First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 14, “FAC”). As more fully set forth below, the undersigned finds the FAC states a First Amendment retaliation claim as to Defendants Cerda and Munoz, but no other claims and recommends that Plaintiff be permitted to proceed only on his cognizable claim and all other defendants and claims be dismissed. //// ////
1 This matter was referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…