Munoz

(PC) Harris v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20231:21-cv-01372California5,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE BERNARD HARRIS Case No. 1:21-cv-01372-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ONLY

v. ON COGNIZABLE FIRST AMENDMENT

CLAIMS1

E. MUNOZ, J. CERDA, E. SILVA, A. PEDERSON, K. MATTA, and M. (Doc. No. 14) MEDINA,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendants.

18 Plaintiff Devonte Bernard Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding on his First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 14, “FAC”). As more fully set forth below, the undersigned finds the FAC states a First Amendment retaliation claim as to Defendants Cerda and Munoz, but no other claims and recommends that Plaintiff be permitted to proceed only on his cognizable claim and all other defendants and claims be dismissed. //// ////

1 This matter was referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.