Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] RUDY AROCHA, No. 2:22-cv-0638 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER RALPH M. DIAZ, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a motion for an award of attorney’s 18 || fees. To the extent plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees under provisions of California law, such 19 || provisions are not applicable in this court. To the extent plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1988, pro se litigants are not entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under that statute. Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, 435 (1991). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 22 plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file a motion for an award of attorney’s fees (ECF 23 || No. 17) 1s denied. 24 Dated: March 24, 2023 □□ I / dip Ze CAROLYNK. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4 aroc0638.fees