Castro

(HC) Hardney v. Castro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20232:21-cv-01040California939 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN HARDNEY, No. 2:21-cv-01040-DAD-DMC (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

R. CASTRO, PETITION FOR FEDERAL HABEAS RELIEF Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 1, 12, 16)

17 Petitioner John Hardney proceeds pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 19, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition for federal habeas relief be denied. (Doc. No. 16.) The findings and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of service. (Id. at 11.) On May 19, 2022, petitioner filed timely objections to the pending findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.