Poole

(PS) G.M. v. Poole

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20232:17-cv-02415California651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 G.M., et al, No. 2:17-cv-02415-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER POOLE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on attorneys Melissa Nold and Patrick Buelna’s Motion to Withdraw as counsel for Plaintiffs. (ECF No. 56.) Defendants Adam Poole and Michael Simpson filed a notice of non-opposition. (ECF No. 57.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// The local rules of this district require an attorney who would withdraw and leave his or her client without representation to obtain leave of court upon a noticed motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(d). Local Rule 182(d) also requires an attorney to provide notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared, and an affidavit stating the current or last known address of the client. Id. Finally, to comply with Local Rule 182(d), the attorney must conform to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.