(PC) Barela v. Stockton Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20232:22-cv-01209California262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OSCAR BARELA, No. 2:22-cv-01209 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.

17 By order filed January 23, 2023, the court found plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The time granted has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.