Kirkham

Kirkham v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20231:22-cv-00191California8,139 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 Mildred K. O’Linn (State Bar No. 159055) missy.olinn@manningkass.com 2 Lynn L. Carpenter (State Bar No. 310011) lynn.carpenter@manningkass.com 3 Deann R. Rivard (State Bar No. 177482) deann.rivard@manningkass.com 4 MANNING & KASS

ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP

5 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 6 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 7 Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF FRESNO 8 (erroneously named as two separate parties: CITY OF FRESNO and FRESNO POLICE 9 DEPARTMENT) CHIEF PACO

BALDERRAMA, OFFICER BRYAN

10 PATTERSON, OFFICER RITCHIE O'DELL,

OFFICER SUPHANYA. SENETHAVYSOUK,

11 OFFICER CHRISTOPHER PARK,

OFFICER BROOKE PASSMORE,

12 and OFFICER MORGAN OGLETREE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 16 17 MICHAEL ALLEN KIRKHAM, 1:22-CV-191 JLT EPG Plaintiff,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

v. FOR CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS

20 CITY OF FRESNO, FRESNO POLICE (ECF No. 16)

DEPARTMENT; PACO BALDERRAMA,

21 individually and in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for Fresno Police Department; 22 OFFICER…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.